23456 | M | W | H | Methods |
---|---|---|---|---|
63452 | s | ss | R.LEGL.YSRYSRYSR.EGLE | |
53426 | s | s | G.Y.L | |
42365 | s | s | – | EGLE.S.G. |
(52364) | s | ss | AKIAKIAK.DCND.IAKIAKIAK. | |
23465 | s | 2 | CNDCN.I.BPBPBP. | |
63425 | s | LEGLEGLE.R | ||
42356 | s | s | – | YSRYSRY.GLEG.SRYSRYS. |
(52346) | s | DC. | ||
34256 | ss | s | – | AKIAKIA.NDCNDCNDC.KI.NDCNDCN. |
23456 | ss | ss | – | R.BPBPBP.C.BPBPBP.L. |
Pair | 1-2 | 3-4 | 5-6 | 7-8 | 9-10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1-2 | 129 (100%) | – | – | – | – |
Anglia Surprise Royal | 9 (100%) | – | – | – | – |
Bristol Surprise Royal | 9 (100%) | – | – | – | – |
Cambridge Surprise Royal | 10 (100%) | – | – | – | – |
Eardleigh Surprise Royal | 9 (100%) | – | – | – | – |
Irvine Surprise Royal | 9 (100%) | – | – | – | – |
Kegworth Surprise Royal | 9 (100%) | – | – | – | – |
Kinross Surprise Royal | 9 (100%) | – | – | – | – |
Lincolnshire Surprise Royal | 9 (100%) | – | – | – | – |
London No. 3 Surprise Royal | 10 (100%) | – | – | – | – |
Nideggen Surprise Royal | 9 (100%) | – | – | – | – |
Pudsey Surprise Royal | 9 (100%) | – | – | – | – |
Rutland Surprise Royal | 10 (100%) | – | – | – | – |
Superlative No. 2 Surprise Royal | 9 (100%) | – | – | – | – |
Yorkshire Surprise Royal | 9 (100%) | – | – | – | – |
3-4 | – | 54 (42%) | – | 24 (19%) | 51 (40%) |
Anglia Surprise Royal | – | – | – | 3 (33%) | 6 (67%) |
Bristol Surprise Royal | – | – | – | 3 (33%) | 6 (67%) |
Cambridge Surprise Royal | – | – | – | 3 (30%) | 7 (70%) |
Eardleigh Surprise Royal | – | 9 (100%) | – | – | – |
Irvine Surprise Royal | – | – | – | 3 (33%) | 6 (67%) |
Kegworth Surprise Royal | – | 9 (100%) | – | – | – |
Kinross Surprise Royal | – | – | – | 3 (33%) | 6 (67%) |
Lincolnshire Surprise Royal | – | – | – | 3 (33%) | 6 (67%) |
London No. 3 Surprise Royal | – | 9 (90%) | – | – | 1 (10%) |
Nideggen Surprise Royal | – | – | – | 3 (33%) | 6 (67%) |
Pudsey Surprise Royal | – | – | – | 3 (33%) | 6 (67%) |
Rutland Surprise Royal | – | 9 (90%) | – | – | 1 (10%) |
Superlative No. 2 Surprise Royal | – | 9 (100%) | – | – | – |
Yorkshire Surprise Royal | – | 9 (100%) | – | – | – |
5-6 | – | 84 (65%) | 45 (35%) | – | – |
Anglia Surprise Royal | – | 6 (67%) | 3 (33%) | – | – |
Bristol Surprise Royal | – | 6 (67%) | 3 (33%) | – | – |
Cambridge Surprise Royal | – | 6 (60%) | 4 (40%) | – | – |
Eardleigh Surprise Royal | – | 6 (67%) | 3 (33%) | – | – |
Irvine Surprise Royal | – | 6 (67%) | 3 (33%) | – | – |
Kegworth Surprise Royal | – | 6 (67%) | 3 (33%) | – | – |
Kinross Surprise Royal | – | 6 (67%) | 3 (33%) | – | – |
Lincolnshire Surprise Royal | – | 6 (67%) | 3 (33%) | – | – |
London No. 3 Surprise Royal | – | 6 (60%) | 4 (40%) | – | – |
Nideggen Surprise Royal | – | 6 (67%) | 3 (33%) | – | – |
Pudsey Surprise Royal | – | 6 (67%) | 3 (33%) | – | – |
Rutland Surprise Royal | – | 6 (60%) | 4 (40%) | – | – |
Superlative No. 2 Surprise Royal | – | 6 (67%) | 3 (33%) | – | – |
Yorkshire Surprise Royal | – | 6 (67%) | 3 (33%) | – | – |
7-8 | – | – | – | 129 (100%) | – |
Anglia Surprise Royal | – | – | – | 9 (100%) | – |
Bristol Surprise Royal | – | – | – | 9 (100%) | – |
Cambridge Surprise Royal | – | – | – | 10 (100%) | – |
Eardleigh Surprise Royal | – | – | – | 9 (100%) | – |
Irvine Surprise Royal | – | – | – | 9 (100%) | – |
Kegworth Surprise Royal | – | – | – | 9 (100%) | – |
Kinross Surprise Royal | – | – | – | 9 (100%) | – |
Lincolnshire Surprise Royal | – | – | – | 9 (100%) | – |
London No. 3 Surprise Royal | – | – | – | 10 (100%) | – |
Nideggen Surprise Royal | – | – | – | 9 (100%) | – |
Pudsey Surprise Royal | – | – | – | 9 (100%) | – |
Rutland Surprise Royal | – | – | – | 10 (100%) | – |
Superlative No. 2 Surprise Royal | – | – | – | 9 (100%) | – |
Yorkshire Surprise Royal | – | – | – | 9 (100%) | – |
9-0 | – | – | – | – | 129 (100%) |
Anglia Surprise Royal | – | – | – | – | 9 (100%) |
Bristol Surprise Royal | – | – | – | – | 9 (100%) |
Cambridge Surprise Royal | – | – | – | – | 10 (100%) |
Eardleigh Surprise Royal | – | – | – | – | 9 (100%) |
Irvine Surprise Royal | – | – | – | – | 9 (100%) |
Kegworth Surprise Royal | – | – | – | – | 9 (100%) |
Kinross Surprise Royal | – | – | – | – | 9 (100%) |
Lincolnshire Surprise Royal | – | – | – | – | 9 (100%) |
London No. 3 Surprise Royal | – | – | – | – | 10 (100%) |
Nideggen Surprise Royal | – | – | – | – | 9 (100%) |
Pudsey Surprise Royal | – | – | – | – | 9 (100%) |
Rutland Surprise Royal | – | – | – | – | 10 (100%) |
Superlative No. 2 Surprise Royal | – | – | – | – | 9 (100%) |
Yorkshire Surprise Royal | – | – | – | – | 9 (100%) |
Similarity | Related Composition |
---|---|
Identical calling, changes and rows | 5160 14-Spliced Surprise Royal by Richard A Pearce |
Date | Type | Details | |
---|---|---|---|
Wed 11 Feb 2009 | First rung on handbells | 5160 Spliced Surprise Royal by the Oxford Diocesan Guild at 7 Laburnham Road, Maidenhead, Berkshire, conducted by David C Brown |
Collection | Chapter | Page | Reference |
---|---|---|---|
Compositions of the Decade (2000-2009) | Royal | ||
Spliced Surprise Royal (9-14 methods) by Richard A Pearce |