23456 | M | I | W | H | 5 | Methods | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
42356 | – | RCNLYYLYY. | (9) | ||||
54326 | – | RY.L | |||||
42635 | – | 2 | L.Y.RYL.L | ||||
35264 | – | 2 | 2 | NCCC.N.CNLNNRNCL.R.CLYCRNYRC. | (12,3,9) | ||
63254 | – | 3 | CR.YNCC.YNLYNRYNL.RCNRYYRYY. | (6,9,9) | |||
56234 | – | RY.L | |||||
24365 | – | – | 2 | L.N.R.LCR. | |||
(46325) | – | – | – | R.LR.LR. | |||
32465 | – | – | LR.L. | (8) | |||
63425 | – | YL.L | |||||
25346 | – | 2 | 2 | NCCC.N.CNLNNRNCL.R.CLYCRNYRC. | (12,3,9) | ||
23456 | – | 2 | CR.YNCC.YNRYNLYNL. | (6,9) |
Pair | 1-2 | 3-4 | 5-6 | 7-8 | 9-10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1-2 | 125 (100%) | – | – | – | – |
Cambridge Surprise Royal | 25 (100%) | – | – | – | – |
Lincolnshire Surprise Royal | 25 (100%) | – | – | – | – |
London No. 3 Surprise Royal | 25 (100%) | – | – | – | – |
Rutland Surprise Royal | 25 (100%) | – | – | – | – |
Yorkshire Surprise Royal | 25 (100%) | – | – | – | – |
3-4 | – | 44 (35%) | 3 (2%) | 10 (8%) | 68 (54%) |
Cambridge Surprise Royal | – | 11 (44%) | – | 3 (12%) | 11 (44%) |
Lincolnshire Surprise Royal | – | 8 (32%) | 1 (4%) | 2 (8%) | 14 (56%) |
London No. 3 Surprise Royal | – | 9 (36%) | 2 (8%) | – | 14 (56%) |
Rutland Surprise Royal | – | 8 (32%) | – | 3 (12%) | 14 (56%) |
Yorkshire Surprise Royal | – | 8 (32%) | – | 2 (8%) | 15 (60%) |
5-6 | – | 40 (32%) | 32 (26%) | 19 (15%) | 34 (27%) |
Cambridge Surprise Royal | – | 13 (52%) | 4 (16%) | 2 (8%) | 6 (24%) |
Lincolnshire Surprise Royal | – | 8 (32%) | 5 (20%) | 2 (8%) | 10 (40%) |
London No. 3 Surprise Royal | – | 7 (28%) | 7 (28%) | 3 (12%) | 8 (32%) |
Rutland Surprise Royal | – | 6 (24%) | 6 (24%) | 8 (32%) | 5 (20%) |
Yorkshire Surprise Royal | – | 6 (24%) | 10 (40%) | 4 (16%) | 5 (20%) |
7-8 | – | – | 2 (2%) | 123 (98%) | – |
Cambridge Surprise Royal | – | – | – | 25 (100%) | – |
Lincolnshire Surprise Royal | – | – | – | 25 (100%) | – |
London No. 3 Surprise Royal | – | – | 1 (4%) | 24 (96%) | – |
Rutland Surprise Royal | – | – | 1 (4%) | 24 (96%) | – |
Yorkshire Surprise Royal | – | – | – | 25 (100%) | – |
9-0 | – | 2 (2%) | – | – | 123 (98%) |
Cambridge Surprise Royal | – | – | – | – | 25 (100%) |
Lincolnshire Surprise Royal | – | – | – | – | 25 (100%) |
London No. 3 Surprise Royal | – | 1 (4%) | – | – | 24 (96%) |
Rutland Surprise Royal | – | 1 (4%) | – | – | 24 (96%) |
Yorkshire Surprise Royal | – | – | – | – | 25 (100%) |
Similarity | Related Composition |
---|---|
Identical calling, changes and rows | 5000 Spliced Surprise Royal by David W Beard |
Date | Type | Details | |
---|---|---|---|
Sat 29 Dec 1979 | First rung on towerbells | 5000 Spliced Surprise Royal (5m) by the Yorkshire Association at All Saints, Rotherham, South Yorkshire, conducted by Stuart Armeson |