23456 | M | W | H | Methods |
---|---|---|---|---|
42356 | – | BNBBCB. | ||
54326 | – | LC.L | ||
34256 | 3 | 2 | – | NBBNB.SRSSNS.RNNLNCLNB.B.RRRLRLLRL.NLCSLNB. |
53246 | – | RN.R | ||
36245 | – | 2 | CCLCBC.RB.CSLCSLNSL. | |
43265 | – | 3 | CSLCSRCS.R.RCSRNSRCB.SRNSRNSRC. | |
23564 | – | 3 | CNRNCRB.LB.SLCSLCSLS.LNL. | |
(65432) | – | – | R.B. | |
23456 | – | – | – | CSBB.N.BNBNB. |
Pair | 1-2 | 3-4 | 5-6 | 7-8 | 9-10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1-2 | 126 (100%) | – | – | – | – |
Bristol Surprise Royal | 21 (100%) | – | – | – | – |
Cambridge Surprise Royal | 21 (100%) | – | – | – | – |
Lincolnshire Surprise Royal | 21 (100%) | – | – | – | – |
London No. 3 Surprise Royal | 21 (100%) | – | – | – | – |
Rutland Surprise Royal | 21 (100%) | – | – | – | – |
Superlative No. 2 Surprise Royal | 21 (100%) | – | – | – | – |
3-4 | – | 35 (28%) | – | 34 (27%) | 57 (45%) |
Bristol Surprise Royal | – | 10 (48%) | – | 4 (19%) | 7 (33%) |
Cambridge Surprise Royal | – | 6 (29%) | – | 4 (19%) | 11 (52%) |
Lincolnshire Surprise Royal | – | 6 (29%) | – | 5 (24%) | 10 (48%) |
London No. 3 Surprise Royal | – | 4 (19%) | – | 10 (48%) | 7 (33%) |
Rutland Surprise Royal | – | 4 (19%) | – | 7 (33%) | 10 (48%) |
Superlative No. 2 Surprise Royal | – | 5 (24%) | – | 4 (19%) | 12 (57%) |
5-6 | – | 33 (26%) | 48 (38%) | 21 (17%) | 24 (19%) |
Bristol Surprise Royal | – | 6 (29%) | 10 (48%) | 1 (5%) | 4 (19%) |
Cambridge Surprise Royal | – | 8 (38%) | 8 (38%) | 3 (14%) | 2 (10%) |
Lincolnshire Surprise Royal | – | 3 (14%) | 11 (52%) | 1 (5%) | 6 (29%) |
London No. 3 Surprise Royal | – | 8 (38%) | 3 (14%) | 6 (29%) | 4 (19%) |
Rutland Surprise Royal | – | 1 (5%) | 10 (48%) | 7 (33%) | 3 (14%) |
Superlative No. 2 Surprise Royal | – | 7 (33%) | 6 (29%) | 3 (14%) | 5 (24%) |
7-8 | – | – | – | 126 (100%) | – |
Bristol Surprise Royal | – | – | – | 21 (100%) | – |
Cambridge Surprise Royal | – | – | – | 21 (100%) | – |
Lincolnshire Surprise Royal | – | – | – | 21 (100%) | – |
London No. 3 Surprise Royal | – | – | – | 21 (100%) | – |
Rutland Surprise Royal | – | – | – | 21 (100%) | – |
Superlative No. 2 Surprise Royal | – | – | – | 21 (100%) | – |
9-0 | – | – | – | – | 126 (100%) |
Bristol Surprise Royal | – | – | – | – | 21 (100%) |
Cambridge Surprise Royal | – | – | – | – | 21 (100%) |
Lincolnshire Surprise Royal | – | – | – | – | 21 (100%) |
London No. 3 Surprise Royal | – | – | – | – | 21 (100%) |
Rutland Surprise Royal | – | – | – | – | 21 (100%) |
Superlative No. 2 Surprise Royal | – | – | – | – | 21 (100%) |
Date | Type | Details | |
---|---|---|---|
Tue 15 Oct 2002 | First rung on towerbells | 5040 Spliced Surprise Royal by the Kent County Association at St George, Beckenham, Kent, conducted by John B Keeler |
Collection | Chapter | Page | Reference |
---|---|---|---|
KCA Compositions (2002) | 13663 | ||
Richard I Allton | Surprise Royal | 247 |